It’s always amazing to watch the double standards displayed at the United Nations!
Yesterday, it was reported that Israel should consider capturing Iranian President Ahmadinejad and hauling him before an international court in Hague. And suddenly Iran is demanding action by the United Nations!
Iran demanded on Tuesday a “resolute and clear response” from the United Nations to what it called dangerous threats against it by Israel, and said Tehran would not hesitate to respond to any attack.
A letter from Iran’s UN Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described comments by two Israeli ministers as “vicious threats … in blatant violation of the most fundamental principles of international law.”
Now let’s look at the differences. On one hand, we see the democratic state of Israel desiring to bring the Iranian President before a court of law to judge him of any wrongdoing. And on the other hand, we see the Iranian President repeatedly calling for the complete annihilation of the Jewish State. Hmmm…I wonder what the United Nations will do!
Let’s look at their track record! They’ve passed an astounding 429 resolutions either criticizing or opposing the actions of Israel. As well as, being condemned by the international body 321 times. Meanwhile, there has never been a resolution that has condemned the threats made against Israel and even more alarming there’s never been a resolution against any of terrorist acts which have been committed against Israel!
It’s no wonder the headquarters of the United Nations in Jerusalem sits on the site known as the “hill of evil counsel!” For those who are unfamiliar with the “hill of evil counsel”, it’s the location where Judas held his final meeting with the Pharisees when he betrayed Jesus!
Nevertheless, the Jerusalem Post reported that Israeli officials gathered together to discuss the Iranian nuclear program!
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is scheduled to meet Wednesday with Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni for what have been characterized as “security discussions,” and which are expected to focus on Iran and the prospect it will soon open its first nuclear plant.
Until next time…
