Attorney Says Boy Scout Case in Connecticut May Influence Future Cases
By Rusty Pugh
AFR News
August 2, 2000
(AgapePress) - A pro-family attorney says the recent Supreme Court decision in the Boy
Scout case could have a trickle-down effect.
A state agency in Connecticut determined last May that the Boy Scouts were in violation of
the states discrimination laws. As a result, they were dropped from a list of
charities that state workers can support through their payroll deduction plan. The Scouts
claim that it is because of their opposition to homosexuality. But a federal judge in
Connecticut ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts, ordering that they be put back on the list
of charitable organizations.
AFA Center for Law and Policy Attorney Brian Fahling says this was the result of the
recent Supreme Court decision, which is having a ripple effect.
"The Supreme Court decision...said [in effect] that the constitutional right of free
association and the right to believe as one wishes overrides any state laws that might
circumscribe that right or might interfere with that right," Fahling says. "The
recent Boy Scout decision...reaffirmed those settled principles."
"What we have now is a court that has recognized that [decision] and said...the state
cannot discriminate against the Boy Scouts under any state provision," he says.
"[The state] must allow them...to be presented [on equal footing] with other
charitable organizations to the employees of that state for them to choose."
Fahling believes the high courts decision could have an effect on future cases
dealing with private organizations, and their right to freedom of association.
2000 Copyright, Agape Press.