THE TROUBLE WITH
DIGITAL ANGELS
By Thomas Horn
Several weeks ago a disturbing secular
news story grabbed my attention. Applied Digital Solutions (ADS) received patent rights to
new technology named Digital Angel (TM). What's bothersome is that Digital Angel is a
miniature digital transceiver specifically designed for human implantation (original
patent info).
According to ADS, "The implantable transceiver sends and receives data and can
be continuously tracked by GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) technology. The
transceiver's power supply and actuation system are unlike anything ever created. When
implanted within a body, the device is powered electromechanically through the movement of
muscles, and it can be activated either by the 'wearer' or by the monitoring
facility."
In a company press release dated February 15th, ADS stated that
"Digital Angel has generated a large and positive response from both the investing
public and those who are interested in participating in the wide array of applications for
this technology."
ADS also claims that Digital Angel has "a variety of potential uses, such as
providing a tamper-proof
means of identification for enhanced e-business security, animal tracking, locating lost
or missing individuals, tracking the location of valuable property and monitoring the
medical conditions of at-risk patients."
To further advocate Digital Angel technology, Applied Digital Solutions launched a
website http://www.digitalangel.net where
viewers can peruse diagrams and read summary information. Although still in the
developmental stage, a prototype of the device is scheduled for release by the end of
2000.
Other manufacturers of sub-skin implants have quietly field-tested similar devices
over the past few years. The London Times reported in October 1998, "Film stars and
the children of millionaires are among 45 people, including several Britons, who have been
fitted with the chips (called the Sky Eye) in secret tests."
Due to civil liberty and privacy issues, the ACLU announced opposition to mandatory
microchip implantation when applied to humans. The ACLU is certain to be a strange
bedfellow of Christians and conservatives concerning this issue.
THE FULFILLMENT OF PROPHECY?
Many Christians believe that, before long, an antichrist system will appear. It will
be a New World Order, under which national boundaries dissolve, and ethnic groups,
ideologies, religions, and economics from around the world, orchestrate a single and
dominant sovereignty. Such a system will supposedly be free of religious and political
extremes, and membership will tolerate the philosophical and cultural differences of its
constituents. Except for minor nonconformities, war, intolerance, and hunger will be a
thing of the past.
According to popular Biblical interpretation, a single personality will surface at
the head of the utopian administration. He will appear as a man of distinguished
character, but will ultimately become "a king of fierce countenance" (Dan.
8:23). With imperious decree the Antichrist will facilitate a one-world government,
universal religion, and globally monitored socialism. Those who refuse his New World Order
will inevitably be imprisoned or destroyed, until at last he exalts himself "above
all that is called God, or that is worshiped, so that he, as God, sitteth in the temple of
God, showing himself that he is God" (2 Thess. 2:4).
The
Antichrist's widespread power will be derived at the expense of individual human
liberties. He will force "all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond to
receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or
sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here
is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the
number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six [666]" (Rev.
13:16-18).
For many years the idea that humans could somehow succumb to little more than
branded cattle, and that rugged individualism would thereafter be sacrificed for an
anesthetized universal harmony, was repudiated by Americas greatest minds. Then, in
the 1970s, things began to change. Following a call by Nelson Rockefeller for the
creation of a "New World Order," presidential candidate Jimmy Carter campaigned,
saying, "We must replace balance of power politics with world order politics."
During the 1980's President George Bush continued the one-world dirge, announcing
over national television that "a New World Order" had arrived. Following the
initial broadcast, President Bush addressed the Congress, saying,
What is at stake is more than one small country [Kuwait], it
is a big idea--a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause
to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule
of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our childrens future!
Ever since the President's astonishing newscast, a parade of political and religious
leaders have discharged a profusion of rhetoric aimed at implementing the goals of a New
World Order. In his Friday Fax, Austin Ruse of Catholic Family & Human Rights
Institute (www.c-fam.org) wrote:
The 55th annual meeting of the UN General Assembly next fall
will go by the name of the Millennium Assembly. The resolution calling for this special
meeting of the Member States said, 'The year 2000 constitutes a unique and symbolically
compelling moment to articulate and affirm an animating vision for the United Nations in
the new era.' The Member States also look upon the new meeting as an opportunity to
'strengthen the role of the United Nations.'
Austin continues:
At the same time as the GAs Millennium Assembly,
Secretary General Kofi Annan will host a shorter 'Millennium Summit' that will deal with a
broad range of themes including 'the role and function of the UN,' 'towards a global
society,' 'new challenges to multi-lateralism in the era of globalization,' 'international
cooperation,' and 'promoting peace and sustainable development of mankind.' The Millennium
Summit will also deal with human rights. Radical notions of reproductive 'rights' and
population control generally enter the UN debate through the concepts of human rights and
'sustainable development.'
Developers of biometric implant chips employ similar language to announce compatible
global technologies, and many Americans consider electronically marking humans or
implanting a series of digital equations under the skin to be the natural progress of
advancing and necessary technologies.
Photo to the left: 1980 defense department
cartoon showing a change taking place in Defense Management. A runner hands over plans for
national defense to another runner with "666" on his track suit.
The following are a few examples:
As far back
as 1973, Senior Scholastics introduced school age children to the concept of buying and
selling using numbers inserted in the forehead. In the September 20, 1973 feature
"Who Is Watching You?" the secular high school journal speculated:
"All buying and selling in the program will be done by computer. No
currency, no change, no checks. In the program, people would receive a number that had
been assigned them tattooed in their wrist or forehead. The number is put on by laser beam
and cannot be felt. The number in the body is not seen with the naked eye and is as
permanent as your fingerprints. All items of consumer goods will be marked with a computer
mark. The computer outlet in the store which picks up the number on the items at the
checkstand will also pick up the number in the person's body and automatically total the
price and deduct the amount from the person's 'Special Drawing Rights' account."
Bar codes began appearing in grocery stores a few years after the article
above. Some claim that all such codes contain the number 666 (explantation)
In the 1974
article "The Specter of Eugenics," Charles Frankel pointed out Linus Pauling's
(Nobel Prize winner) suggestions that a mark be tattooed on the foot or forehead of every
young person. Pauling envisioned a mark denoting genotype.
In 1980, U.S.
News and World Report continued the warning, pointing out that the Federal Government was
contemplating "National Identity Cards," without which nobody could work or
conduct business.
The Denver
Post Sun followed up in 1981, claiming that chip implants could
someday replace I.D.
cards. The June 21, 1981 story read in part, "The chip is placed in a needle which is
affixed to a simple syringe containing an anti-bacterial solution. The needle is capped
and ready to forever identify something--or somebody."
The May 7,
1996 Chicago Tribune questioned whether we could trust Big Brother under our skin?
In 1997
applications for patents of subcutaneous implant devices for "a person or an
animal" are applied for (see
documentation).
The April 27,
1998, edition of Time Magazine runs the story, The Big Bank Theory And What It Says About
The Future OF Money, in which they opine "Your daughter can store the money any way
she wants--on her laptop, on a debit card, even (in the not too distant future) on a chip
implanted under her skin."
In August
1998 the BBC covered the first known human microchip implantation. (see documentation)
That same
month the Sunday Oregonian warned that proposed medical identifiers might erode privacy
rights by tracking individuals through alphanumeric health identifier technologies. The
startling Oregonian feature depicted humans with barcodes in their foreheads.
Bionics
technology is attempting to create organisms that contain linked organic (human cells)
material with biometric chips for human implantation (documentation site)
Now it's the
year 2000, and Digital Angel has arrived.
[The ominous
Oregonian feature]
WILL DIGITAL "MARKS" SOON BE MANDATORY?
Microchip implantation is currently introduced as a voluntary procedure. But a
report written by Elaine M. Ramish for the Franklin Pierce Law Center says, "A [mandatory] national identification system via microchip implants
could be achieved in two stages: Upon introduction as a voluntary system, the microchip
implantation will appear to be palatable. After there is a familiarity with the procedure
and a knowledge of its benefits, implantation would be mandatory."
Writing for WorldNetDaily.com (Concern over microchip implants, 1999), Jon E.
Dougherty quoted George Getz, the communications director for the Libertarian Party:
After all, the government has never forced anyone to
have a driver license, [but] try getting along without one, when everyone from your local
banker to the car rental man to the hotel operator to the grocery store requires one in
order for you to take advantage of their services, that amounts to a de facto mandate. If
the government can force you to surrender your fingerprints to get a drivers license, why
can't it force you to get a computer chip implant? These are differences in degree, not in
kind--which is why it's essential to fight government privacy invasions from the outset.
As Social Security numbers were first voluntary, then mandatory, biometric chip
implants are universally inevitable unless citizens rise up in immediate and national
opposition. People like Mr. Getz may be on to something. Conservatives and liberals alike
better contact state and federal representatives while they still can and demand immediate
protection. Laws preserving individual rights need to be enacted by Congress before
Digital Angel and similar forces lead humanity down a high-tech path of no return.
And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice,
If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in
his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out
without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and
brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb. And the
smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor
night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his
name" (Rev. 14:9-11).
By Thomas Horn
Editor@RaidersNewsUpdate.com
www.raidersnewsupdate.com
Copyright © 2000 Thomas Horn. Article reprinted with
permission from the Author.
Special Thanks from Worthy News to Thomas Horn for this
excellent article. |