Federal Judge Strikes Down Trump-Era Religious Liberty Protections for Employers

by Emmitt Barry, with reporting from Washington D.C. Bureau Staff

(Worthy News) – A federal judge appointed by President Obama has struck a blow to religious liberty, overturning protections that allowed faith-based employers to decline covering abortion and contraceptives in their health insurance plans.

On August 13, U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone vacated two 2018 Affordable Care Act exemptions–enacted during President Donald Trump’s first term–that gave employers with religious or moral objections the right to opt out of the mandate. These conscience protections had been hailed by conservatives as a critical defense against government overreach into matters of faith and morality.

Beetlestone, siding with the attorneys general of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, claimed the Trump-era rules were “arbitrary and capricious” and not in compliance with federal law. She dismissed the government’s reliance on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), asserting there was no “rational connection” between protecting religious liberty and exempting employers from mandates that violated their beliefs.

Critics say the ruling disregards the First Amendment rights of religious organizations and could force faith-based employers to participate in practices they consider morally objectionable.

“The district court blessed an out-of-control effort by Pennsylvania and New Jersey to attack the Little Sisters and religious liberty,” said Mark Rienzi, president of Becket, the legal group representing the Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic order that has fought for over a decade to avoid being compelled to fund contraception and abortion services. “It is absurd to think the Little Sisters might need yet another trip to the Supreme Court to end what has now been more than a dozen years of litigation over the same issue. We will fight as far as we need to fight.”

The case has a long history before the nation’s highest court. In 2020, Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, affirmed that the Affordable Care Act granted federal agencies the authority to create both religious and moral exemptions. Justice Samuel Alito, in a concurring opinion, also rejected the idea that the Trump administration’s rules were arbitrary or capricious.

However, lower court challenges continued, delayed for years while the Biden administration attempted to craft narrower rules that would have gutted the exemptions. Those proposed restrictions were quietly withdrawn in late 2024–just before President Trump’s return to the White House.

Despite the withdrawal, Judge Beetlestone moved forward, issuing a nationwide order that effectively nullifies the conscience protections. Her decision sets up the likelihood of yet another Supreme Court showdown over whether the government can force religious employers to provide coverage for services that violate their beliefs.

For religious liberty advocates, the stakes could not be higher. The ruling signals that without clear, permanent protections in law, faith-based organizations may once again face the choice between violating their conscience or paying crushing fines.

Latest Worthy News