Democrats Urge Troops To ‘Refuse Illegal Orders’ As DOJ Warns Of Risks

by Stefan J. Bos, Worthy News Chief International Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Worthy News) – Six Democratic lawmakers with military or intelligence backgrounds have ignited a political firestorm after releasing a video urging U.S. service members and intelligence personnel to “refuse illegal orders,” drawing sharp reactions from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

The one-minute video — titled “Don’t Give Up the Ship” — features Senator Elissa Slotkin and five other veterans declaring: “You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution,” according to footage verified by Worthy News.

The clip, apparently meant to highlight war-powers oversight and domestic deployment concerns by U.S. President Donald J. Trump, quickly went viral, prompting fierce criticism from conservative commentators and several Republican lawmakers.

Sean Hannity, host of broadcaster Fox News’ primetime program Hannity, warned the message “threatens the chain of command,” calling it a “call for insurrection” of military disobedience — a phrase he used to suggest the video encourages a revival of defiance inside the armed forces.

He further challenged the Democrats to “name even one unlawful order” issued by the current administration, noting that without specificity, the message could be seen as partisan and destabilizing.

DOJ REACTION

The DIJ also responded. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche suggested that the Democratic lawmakers behind the video “should be held to account,” stating that the messaging sends a dangerous signal to uniformed personnel.

While stressing that no formal criminal investigation has been launched, Blanche said the video raises “serious concerns” about how elected officials communicate with members of the military and intelligence community during politically charged periods.

His remarks — carried by Fox News — reflected a broader unease within federal law-enforcement circles about political actors issuing directives, even indirect ones, to active-duty personnel.

Republican lawmakers, including Senator Lindsey Graham, said they would demand that the six Democrats provide concrete examples of illegal orders they believe the administration has issued.

The controversy has also revived discussion about federal law governing rebellion and insurrection — statutes that some commentators referenced in dissecting the video’s message.

FEDERAL INSURRECTION STATUTE

Under 18 U.S. Code § 2383, titled Rebellion or Insurrection, U.S. law states: “Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

Legal experts noted that the Democrats’ video does not explicitly call for insurrection and instead invokes established military doctrine: U.S. service members are required to refuse unlawful orders under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

However, critics argue that by failing to identify any specific unlawful orders, the message risks blurring the distinction between legitimate constitutional obligations and political agitation.

The six lawmakers behind the video — Slotkin, Mark Kelly, Jason Crow, Chrissy Houlahan, Chris Deluzio, and Maggie Goodlander — have also backed legislation, including the No Troops in Our Streets Act, which aims to limit domestic military deployment.

As debate intensifies, both the DOJ and commentators, such as Hannity, argue that the issue strikes at the heart of civil-military norms, raising questions about political messaging, wartime oversight, and the boundaries of lawful dissent within the armed forces.

Latest Worthy News