Court Rules in Favor of Constitutional Amendment Saying There’s No 'Fundamental Right to Abortion'

Friday, January 12, 2018 | Tag Cloud Tags: , , , , ,

(Worthy News) - In a resounding victory for pro-life Tennesseans, judges on the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals have rejected the pro-abortion effort to overturn the 2014 voter passage of Amendment 1, which states: “Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion.”

“Although the subject of abortion rights will continue to be controversial in Tennessee and across our nation, it is time for uncertainty surrounding the people’s 2014 approval and ratification of Amendment 1 to be put to rest,” wrote Senior Judge David McKeague, a 2005 appointee of George W. Bush.

Tennessee Right to Life expresses profound gratitude to the many supporters, advocates, and voters who sacrificed to see Amendment 1 placed on the ballot and passed by public vote. It was made necessary by a radical pro-abortion decision by the Tennessee Supreme Court in 2000 which wrongly declared a so-called “fundamental right to abortion” in the Tennessee Constitution thereby making enforcement of common-sense protections impossible in Tennessee. [ Source: Life News (Read More...) ]

Print This Article

Let your Friends know! Be sure to SHARE!

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppGoogle+BufferLinkedInPin ItEmail a Friend
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Google+
Buffer
LinkedIn
Pin It
Email
Copyright 1999-2018 Worthy News. All rights reserved.
Fair Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

1 thought on “Court Rules in Favor of Constitutional Amendment Saying There’s No 'Fundamental Right to Abortion'”

  1. Preparing for Roe v Wade to be overturned, for (the vast majority of abortions in the USA) to be outlawed, once again, takes more than just outlawing it. Our whole US population has grown up without infants and children everywhere.

    Gone are the neighborhoods with children running from yard to yard playing. Maybe in the UltraOrthodox Jewish (Hasidim) neighborhoods, but in few else. Even Mormons abort now and no longer keep that hidden.

    Even the Christian adoption agencies (not including the Catholic who always use it) "screen" using Psychological questionnaires. Psychology based on Freud and Jung. Freud wrote "The Future of an Illusion" and it was his only authorized book (in German). Later abrigded versions cloud that in it, Freud prophesied. He prophesied the demise (the demonic plan) of "all the world's major monotheistic religions."

    To the shame of all Jews and Christians in the English speaking countries and even in the State of Israel also, only the monotheistic religion of Islam has resisted incorporating Psychology into it's beliefs.

    Both (real) Christianity, and Judaism, are monotheistic. Freud was Jewish by birth. Jung the son of a Protestant preacher.

    Freud has almost succeeded; greatly, with the help of Dr. James Dobson.

Leave a Comment