Kansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on 'Gruesome' Dismemberment Abortions

Monday, April 29, 2019 | Tag Cloud Tags: , , , , ,

(Worthy News) - The Kansas Supreme Court ruled Friday blocking a 2015 ban on dismemberment abortions.

The decision prevents the state from enforcing a previously passed law that greatly limited second-trimester abortions.

The Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act (SB 95) was the first in the nation to ban the procedure known as "dilation and evacuation abortions." [ Source: CBN News (Read More...) ]

Copyright 1999-2019 Worthy News. All rights reserved.
Fair Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

2 thoughts on “Kansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on 'Gruesome' Dismemberment Abortions”

  1. This could seriously lead to the breakup of the United State of America unless our US Supreme Court takes action soon to prevent that from happening.

    This is one (very blatant) case wherein the "bleeding liberals" want someone else (an unborn child) to bleed for them instead. Where Conservatives have shown, again blatantly, that they can be "bleeding hearts" for the pain and suffering, the torturing, of undocumented human beings, already living, in this land.

  2. What happened when the slavery issue polarized US States one against another? What happens when the For's get ugly stick it in the Against's faces? Then, they "turn up the heat" (so to speak) on the victims, just to make the victims defenders anger turn to impotent rage? What happened?

    Well, the US Civil War happened. of course, this time, the USA could just let a State, or 8 of them, Secede the Union. I mean, instead of going to war over it all. However, the States for abortion, esp the really ugly stuff like cutting up live babies in the womb and extracting their little arms and legs and internal organs, a bit at a time, are not all aligned either North or South. We got NY way up there and then another one in the middle of the whole contiguous States, and then a State with humane people living in it in between those two and some other's on the other side of the country, and Alaska way up there being whatever it is, this week, it's not the same. Even though it's much the same. It's about the freedom of sadists and toturers and murderers to keep doing what they will, for profit. Verses those who see every human being as equal in the sight of God so it should be in the sight of man also.

    It's about money but whole states are not economically set on abortion (verses slavery) and making a profit off of it. There are similarities with when push came to shove regarding setting slaves free to be masters of their own lives and yet serious differences too, like a US Civil War over it all could, this time, push the USA over the brink. Because, like I pointed out already, the states for abortion are not this time neatly all aligned in the South, into one segment, one portion of the USA. It's not about saving the entire economic system, which then, slavery was that economic base upon which the then "Southern" aristocracy sat. Right now, the abortion industry and it's people and "healthcare" systems which are resting on the monetary systems abortion supports are insignificant compared to the rest of States financial networks.

Leave a Comment