D.C. law requiring ‘good reason’ to carry concealed handguns is ruled unconstitutional


(Worthy News) – A strict D.C. gun law that prevents most firearms owners from carrying concealed handguns in public in the nation’s capital is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court panel ruled Tuesday, saying the city government cannot demand citizens prove a “good reason” before being issued permits.

In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ordered lower courts to issue permanent injunctions blocking enforcement of the law.

City officials said they are considering an appeal, but gun rights supporters said the ruling is a major step and could set up an even bigger victory should the U.S. Supreme Court adopt the circuit judges’ decision. [ Source:Washington Times (Read More…) ]

18
people are currently praying.

Worthy News reports from a biblical worldview with a commitment to accuracy, transparency, and editorial independence. Learn more about About Worthy News, our Editorial Standards, AI Use Policy, Ownership of Worthy News, News Tips and Corrections, and Worthy News Staff.

💡 Did you know? One of the best ways you can support Worthy News is by simply leaving a comment and sharing this article.

📢 Social media algorithms push content further when there’s more engagement — so every 👍 like, 💬 comment, and 🔄 share helps more people discover the truth. 🙌

Latest Worthy News

‘Flat Broke’: DNC Financial Crisis and Leadership Turmoil Alarm Democrats Ahead of Midterms
Trump Says Israel ‘Very Happy’ With Hamas Disarmament Deal, but Netanyahu Signals Deep Reservations
Migrants Flood Spain’s Ceuta Enclave As Death Toll Rises
Senate Again Rejects Resolution Seeking to Halt U.S. War With Iran
Record-Low Danube Threatens Hungary’s Nuclear Power Supply
Trump Says Hamas Has Agreed to Disarm, but Deep Skepticism Remains
Netanyahu Tells Evangelical Leaders: Jews and Christians Are ‘One’ Under Attack
Trump Questions Thune’s Future as Senate GOP Leader Over Stalled Election Bill
U.S. Intelligence Chiefs: China’s Acquisition of American Voter Data Meets Definition of Election Interference
Fair Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Worthy Christian News