Senate votes to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson to U.S. Supreme Court


supreme court worthy christian news

By Casey Harper | The Center Square

(Worthy News) – The U.S. voted 53-47 Thursday to confirm President ’s nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer.

Jackson, a judge on the U.S. for the D.C. Circuit, received bipartisan support. Democrats lauded Jackson and emphasized the historic significance of her appointment as the first Black female Supreme Court justice.

“This confirmation brings us one step closer to healing our nation, one step closer to a perfect union,” U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said.

Though Jackson did garner several votes, many Republicans raised concerns about Jackson’s record, particularly on her handling of child cases, saying she gave lenient sentences. Others argued she has a leftward bent on issues like gun rights and .

“I believe that if confirmed, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson will be the most liberal Supreme Court justice ever to serve on the Supreme Court,” U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-, said ahead of the vote. “What does that mean? She would be a vote to overturn landmark case after landmark case that protects Americans’ fundamental rights.”

Durbin responded to the leniency criticism by pointing to law enforcement support of Jackson.

“From our analysis of Judge Jackson’s record and some of her cases, we believe she has considered the facts and applied the law consistently and fairly on a range of issues,” Fraternal Order of National President Patrick Yoes said. “There is little doubt that she has the temperament, intellect, legal experience, and family background to have earned this appointment. We are reassured that, should she be confirmed, she would approach her future cases with an open mind and treat issues related to law enforcement fairly and justly. We wish her well as the confirmation process begins.”

Other critics said the confirmation process was rushed.

“Now we find ourselves in the midst of a needlessly rushed nomination process where liberal dark money groups are pressuring Senate Democrats to confirm their preferred Supreme Court nominee … many months in advance of when she could actually be seated on the court,” said Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who voted against Jackson’s confirmation.

Jackson sparked controversy during her confirmation hearings for her response to a question from Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn. The senator asked Jackson to define what a woman is, but Jackson said she could not.

“​The fact that you can’t give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive that we are hearing about,” Blackburn said.

Polling taken before Jackson’s confirmation proceedings found she had majority support among those surveyed.

“Fifty-eight percent of Americans say the Senate should vote in favor of Jackson serving on the Supreme Court,” Gallup said. “Only current Chief Justice John Roberts, at 59% in 2005, had a level of support on par with that for Jackson. Most other nominees had support in the low 50% range, with five below that mark.”

The sentiment toward Jackson, though, is largely split along party lines.

“The new poll finds 88% of Democrats, 55% of independents and 31% of Republicans saying the Senate should vote to confirm Jackson,” Gallup said. “The majority of Republicans, 55%, are opposed.”

During her confirmation hearings, Jackson praised the justice she will now replace.

“Justice Breyer not only gave me the greatest job that any young lawyer could ever hope to have,” Jackson said in her testimony, referring to her time serving in a clerkship for Breyer. “But he also exemplifies what it means to be a Supreme Court Justice of the highest level of skill and integrity, civility, and grace. It is extremely humbling to be considered for Justice Breyer’s seat, and I know that I could never fill his shoes.”

Reprinted with permission from The Center Square.
We're being CENSORED ... HELP get the WORD OUT! SHARE!!!
Fair Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Worthy Christian News