Federal Judge Halts California’s Ban on Permitted Concealed Carry in Public


justice worthy christian news

By Kenneth Schrupp | The Center Square

(Worthy News) – A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction against California’s wide-ranging ban on concealed carry users bringing their weapons to a number of public and private places ranging from public transit to parks, stadiums, and banks.

SB 2, passed in 2023, bans concealed carry permit holders in California from bringing their firearms to 26 places, including, hospitals, public transportation, places that sell liquor for on-site consumption, playgrounds, parks, casinos, stadiums, libraries, amusement parks, zoos, places of worship, and banks. In California, concealed carry applicants must undergo thorough background checks that include interviews, fingerprinting, reviews through multiple government databases, and pass a state-certified full-day handgun training program designed for concealed carry permit holders.

“SB2’s coverage is sweeping, repugnant to the Second Amendment, and openly defiant of the Supreme Court,” wrote Judge Cormac J. Carney. “SB2 turns nearly every public place in California into a “sensitive place,” effectively abolishing the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding and exceptionally qualified citizens to be armed and to defend themselves in public.”

The plaintiffs in the case, who are concealed carry permit holders and related organizations, asserted SB 2’s new “sensitive place” restrictions violate their Second Amendment rights and deprive them of their ability to defend themselves and their loved ones in public spaces.

California attorney general Rob Bonta argued that the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized the state’s right to restrict carrying firearms in “sensitive places” and, after the injunction was issued, noted that the lawsuit did not challenge and the injunction did not block “sensitive place” designations regarding school zones, preschools, state or local public buildings, airports, or legislative offices.

“If allowed to stand, this decision would endanger communities by allowing guns in places where families and children gather,” said Bonta in a public statement. “Guns in sensitive public places do not make our communities safer, but rather the opposite.

California governor Gavin Newsom, who introduced a national constitutional amendment to ban “assault weapons,” raise the gun purchasing age, and codify states’ rights to pass more strict gun laws, denounced the decision in a public statement.

“Defying common sense, this ruling outrageously calls California’s data-backed gun safety efforts ‘repugnant,’” Newsom said. “California will keep fighting to defend our laws and to enshrine a Right to Safety in the Constitution.”

Bonta announced he would be appealing the decision to a higher federal court. California cases first decided at a district-level court can be appealed to the 9th Circuit Court, after which they can be appealed yet again to the United States Supreme Court.

We're being CENSORED ... HELP get the WORD OUT! SHARE!!!

Latest Worthy News

Trump Says Iran’s Supreme Leader Should Surrender
Supreme Court Vacates New York Ruling Forcing Catholic Diocese to Cover Abortions
Trump Shares Huckabee’s Message of Faith: “This Moment Sought You” as God Guides Decisions on Israel
Operation Soteria Shield: 109 Children Rescued, 244 Arrested in Texas
Israel Plans to Counter Fallout Risk as Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Sites Continue
US Evangelist Jimmy Swaggart In Critical Condition (Worthy News In-Depth)
FBI Director Kash Patel Declassifies Alleged CCP Election Plot Documents, Hands Docs Over to Congress
Trump Rejects Ceasefire, Demands Iran Abandon Nuclear Program as Tensions Soar
Israel’s Strikes Leave Iran’s Natanz Centrifuges ‘Severely Damaged or Destroyed,’ IAEA Chief Confirms
Fair Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Worthy Christian News