Op-Ed: With the individual mandate dead, the rest of Obamacare is unconstitutional


(Worthy News) – In 2012, Chief Justice John Roberts famously ruled the Affordable Care Act’s provision mandating most people purchase health insurance or else pay a fine constitutional on the basis that Congress has the authority to tax individuals, and the so-called Obamacare “fine” is effectively a tax.

As the now-deceased Justice Antonin Scalia pointed out in his dissenting opinion, in classifying the Obamacare penalty as a “tax,” Roberts ignored history, the language of the healthcare law, statements made by the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress, and common sense. (The obvious difference between a fine and a tax is that the purpose of a tax is to raise revenue, not to force people to behave in a particular way.)

Interestingly, however faulty Roberts’ decision may have been, it now serves as the foundation for a legal argument that could eventually lead to Obamacare’s demise. [ Source (Read More…) ]

10
people are currently praying.

💡 Did you know? One of the best ways you can support Worthy News is by simply leaving a comment and sharing this article.

📢 Social media algorithms push content further when there’s more engagement — so every 👍 like, 💬 comment, and 🔄 share helps more people discover the truth. 🙌

Latest Worthy News

Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Case on Religious Schools and Preschool Funding
Trump Says UFO Files Release Imminent as Debate Intensifies Over ‘Unknown Phenomena’
Israel Mourns Fallen Soldiers on Memorial Day as Leaders Call for Unity Amid War
Trump Signals End to Iran Ceasefire as Deadline Nears, Pressure Mounts for Deal
Teens Detained After Arson Attack On London Synagogue Possibly Linked To Iran
Netanyahu Condemns IDF Soldier After Catholic Icon Vandalized in Southern Lebanon
USS Gerald R. Ford Returns to Middle East After Fire Repairs as U.S. Expands Naval Buildup
Tsunami Warning In Japan
US Seizes Ship In Hormuz Strait; Iran Vows To Retaliate
Fair Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Worthy Christian News